“Human history in every culture has defined marriage as the enduring and intimate relationship of a man and a woman,” said Leith Anderson, NAE president. “This definition has established the primary expression of a family. It is worthy of protection.”
The NAE joined an amici brief with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Southern Baptist Convention, The Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, and many NAE denominations encouraging the Supreme Court not to impose a redefinition of marriage on every state.
The brief argues that marriage between a man and a woman provides for the welfare of children, families and society. It reiterates that the groups’ beliefs are based on clear biblical teaching and concern for social welfare and certainly not animus for anyone. The Supreme Court should avoid presuming animus on the part of supporters of traditional marriage, because such a finding may stigmatize millions of religious believers and imperil their religious freedom.
Galen Carey, NAE vice president of government relations, said, “Marriage between a man and a woman is the basis on which families, communities and nations thrive. We believe citizens, not judges, should have the right to define marriage in the states in which they live.”
Anderson continued, “Many people of goodwill disagree with our position of marriage, but we ask that our beliefs about marriage, which are based on God’s Word, be respected and protected.”
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments the week of April 27 and deliberate the arguments the week of May 4. A decision in the Obergefell v. Hodges case is expected to be announced at the end of June.